Klarna’s AI Customer Service Agents Signal Potential Disruption in Knowledge Work
OpenAI-powered agents handle two-thirds of customer chats, reducing costs and response times
Klarna recently revealed that during their first month of deployment, its AI-powered customer service agents, built using OpenAI’s technology, handled the equivalent workload of 700 full-time human agents. This accounted for two-thirds of all customer support chats. The AI agents resolved tasks in under 2 minutes, compared to the 11 minutes typically required by human agents, while achieving comparable customer satisfaction scores.
Our estimates suggest that Klarna’s 700 human agents handled 2.3 million conversations per month at a cost of $3.6 million, or $1.58 per conversation. In contrast, an OpenAI-powered agent addressing the same volume at 2 minutes per chat would cost no more than approximately $9,000 per month, or $0.004 per conversation, based on GPT-4’s current pricing. This switch from human to AI agents could potentially save Klarna nearly 100% in labor costs.
Although companies like Klarna will likely maintain human-in-the-loop systems to handle customer support cases that AI cannot resolve, the efficiency gains from AI are expected to significantly reduce the number of humans in customer support roles. Moreover, we anticipate that all language-centric knowledge work related to enterprise sales, technical support, and customer success will face substantial disruption.
Sebastian Siemiatkowski, co-founder and CEO of Klarna. “We are incredibly excited about this launch, but it also underscores the profound impact on society that AI will have. We want to reemphasize and encourage society and politicians to consider this carefully and believe a considerate, informed and steady stewardship will be critical to navigate through this transformation of our societies.
Recent Blog Posts
AI and Jobs: What Three Decades of Building Tech Taught Me About What’s Coming
In 2023, I started warning people. Friends. Family. Anyone who would listen. I told them AI would upend their careers within three years. Most nodded politely and moved on. Some laughed. A few got defensive. Almost nobody took it seriously. It's 2026 now. I was right. I wish I hadn't been. Who Am I to Say This? I've spent thirty years building what's next before most people knew it was coming. My earliest partner was Craig Newmark. We co-founded DigitalThreads in San Francisco in the mid-90s — Craig credits me with naming Craigslist and the initial setup. That project reshaped...
Feb 12, 2026The Species That Wasn’t Ready
Last Tuesday, Matt Shumer — an AI startup founder and investor — published a viral 4,000-word post on X comparing the current moment to February 2020. Back then, a few people were talking about a virus originating out of Wuhan, China. Most of us weren't listening. Three weeks later, the world rearranged itself. His argument: we're in the "this seems overblown" phase of something much bigger than Covid. The same morning, my wife told me she was sick of AI commercials. Too much hype. Reminded her of Crypto. Nothing good would come of it. Twenty dollars a month? For what?...
Feb 9, 2026Six ideas from the Musk-Dwarkesh podcast I can’t stop thinking about
I spent three days with this podcast. Listened on a walk, in the car, at my desk with a notepad. Three hours is a lot to ask of anyone, especially when half of it is Musk riffing on turbine blade casting and lunar mass drivers. But there are five or six ideas buried in here that I keep turning over. The conversation features Dwarkesh Patel and Stripe co-founder John Collison pressing Musk on orbital data centers, humanoid robots, China, AI alignment, and DOGE. It came days after SpaceX and xAI officially merged, a $1.25 trillion combination that sounds insane until you hear...