AI assistants tested to the max on conversational quality, image creation

The race to crown the best AI tools has intensified as these systems become increasingly capable across diverse tasks. While AI is making impressive strides in writing, image creation, and conversation, significant differences in quality and performance exist between leading models. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for users navigating the growing ecosystem of AI assistants, whether they’re creating content, generating images, or seeking a digital conversation partner.

Best for Images: OpenAI’s 4o image creation mode outperforms competitors for visual content.

• The system surpasses Midjourney and can transform imperfect photos into beautiful artwork while preserving the original image’s character.
• Strategic prompting is required to achieve optimal results from the system.

Best for Writing Fiction: The optimal AI writing assistant depends on budget constraints.

• Free users will find Gemini 2.5 Pro offers the strongest fiction writing capabilities without cost.
• Paid users should opt for GPT 4.5, though all AI writing systems still produce notably predictable and overwrought prose.
• These tools excel at bedtime stories and generating ideas, but require careful prompting to improve quality.

Best at Conversation: Different AI systems offer varying conversational experiences.

• Claude 3.5 Sonnet provides the most engaging and thought-provoking conversations among current AI assistants.
• GPT 4.5 offers fascinating conversations but comes with drawbacks including high cost and slow response times.
• Gemini 2.5 falls short in conversational ability, with interactions that feel too similar to customer service exchanges.

Overall Recommendations: Two clear winners emerge for different user segments.

• ChatGPT delivers the best overall experience for users willing to pay for AI assistance.
• Gemini 2.5 Pro stands as the top choice for those seeking free AI tools.

The human advantage: When the author tested AI systems by having them write a newsletter, the results revealed that despite rapid improvement, humans still maintain superiority in nuanced writing.