×
Anti-diversity activist sues Google for $15M over AI hallucinations
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Robby Starbuck, an anti-diversity activist known for his corporate campaigns, has filed a $15 million defamation lawsuit against Google, claiming the company’s AI search tools falsely linked him to sexual assault allegations and white nationalist Richard Spencer. This marks Starbuck’s second legal challenge against a major tech company over AI-generated content, following a successful settlement with Meta that resulted in him being hired as an advisor to combat “ideological and political bias” in its chatbot.

What you should know: The lawsuit targets Google’s AI search capabilities for allegedly generating false and defamatory information about Starbuck.

  • Starbuck claims Google’s AI tools incorrectly associated him with sexual assault allegations and connected him to white nationalist Richard Spencer.
  • He filed the suit in Delaware Superior Court seeking $15 million in damages, according to the Wall Street Journal.
  • This follows a similar pattern to his April lawsuit against Meta, which was settled when the company hired him as an advisor.

Google’s response: The company acknowledged the complaint while pointing to known limitations of AI technology.

  • Google spokesperson José Castañeda told The Verge that “most of these claims relate to hallucinations in Bard that we addressed in 2023.”
  • “Hallucinations are a well known issue for all LLMs, which we disclose and work hard to minimize. But as everyone knows, if you’re creative enough, you can prompt a chatbot to say something misleading,” Castañeda said.

In plain English: AI “hallucinations” occur when chatbots confidently generate false information that sounds plausible but isn’t based on real data—like a confident student giving a wrong answer on a test.

Legal precedent challenges: No U.S. court has yet awarded damages in a defamation case involving AI chatbots, creating uncertainty around these emerging legal battles.

  • Conservative radio host Mark Walters sued OpenAI in 2023, claiming ChatGPT defamed him by linking him to fraud and embezzlement accusations.
  • The court ruled in favor of OpenAI, finding that Walters failed to prove “actual malice.”
  • AI chatbots represent very new technologies with limited legal precedent surrounding them.

The bigger picture: Starbuck’s legal strategy appears designed to secure influence within tech companies rather than simply win monetary damages.

  • His Meta settlement was part of a series of hires that seemed aimed at addressing conservative criticism of the platform.
  • The exact terms of the Meta settlement remain unknown, but it resulted in Starbuck gaining an advisory position.
  • Industry observers suggest Starbuck would likely be “just as happy with a position of influence” at Google as he secured at Meta.
Anti-diversity activist Robby Starbuck is suing Google now

Recent News

How Magnus Carlsen’s chess AI strategy applies to coding

The real skill lies in knowing which AI recommendations to accept or reject.

Meta lays off 600 from AI lab while investing $65B in superintelligence

Meta cuts staff while pouring billions into "superintelligence" research and infrastructure.

AWS suffers 15-hour outage after laying off hundreds of tech workers

Veteran engineers knew which seemingly unrelated systems to check when DNS wobbled.