Meta removes AI-generated Jamie Lee Curtis ads after star’s appeal

Meta’s swift response to Jamie Lee Curtis’s direct appeal demonstrates how celebrities are increasingly battling unauthorized AI-generated content that misrepresents them on social media platforms. The incident highlights both the growing challenge of deepfakes for public figures and the accountability tech companies face in policing AI misuse on their platforms, particularly when it involves unauthorized commercial appropriation of recognizable personalities.

The big picture: Meta removed fake AI-generated ads featuring Jamie Lee Curtis after she directly appealed to CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Instagram to take them down.

• Curtis described the unauthorized content as “some bullshit that I didn’t authorize, agree to or endorse,” noting it had manipulated footage from her MSNBC interview about Los Angeles wildfires.
• Meta spokesperson Andy Stone confirmed to Variety that the ads violated company policies and were subsequently removed.

What they’re saying: Curtis framed the issue as damaging to her personal brand and authenticity in her public appeal to Zuckerberg.

• “If I have a brand, besides being an actor and author and advocate, it is that I am known for telling the truth and saying it like it is and for having integrity,” Curtis wrote.
• She specifically criticized how the fake ads put “new, fake words” in her mouth, which “diminishes my opportunities to actually speak my truth.”

Behind the strategy: Curtis’s approach reveals the limited recourse celebrities have when facing AI misrepresentation.

• The actress mentioned she had previously “gone through every proper channel” to have the content removed before directly appealing to Zuckerberg.
• Curtis noted she had “long ago deleted Twitter,” making Instagram her only viable platform for reaching out to Meta’s leadership.

Why this matters: The incident underscores the growing challenge tech platforms face in identifying and removing AI-generated content that misappropriates celebrity identities for commercial purposes.

• Curtis’s high-profile case demonstrates how even established public figures must resort to public appeals when standard content removal processes prove insufficient.
• The quick resolution after tagging Zuckerberg suggests that visibility and attention remain powerful factors in content moderation decisions.